РЕПРЕЗЕНТАЦІЯ КОНЦЕПТУ КОНФЛІКТ У ЛЕКСИКОГРАФІЧНОМУ ДИСКУРСІ

dc.contributor.authorHarbera, I.V.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-21T08:58:01Z
dc.date.available2022-12-21T08:58:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionСтаття у збірнику наукових праць Закарпатські філологічні студії. Випуск 20. Том 1 РОЗДІЛ 4 ЗАГАЛЬНЕ МОВОЗНАВСТВОen_US
dc.description.abstractThe article states that cognitive linguistics, lexicography and discourse play an important role in determining the qualification features of the concept conflict. The theoretical basis of the study are well-known definitions of conflict: it is a contradiction that a person perceives as a significant problem that requires solution and causes activity to overcome it; it is a state (or situation) of conflict between the parties (parties to the conflict) who have incompatible views, goals, etc., due to which each of them acts against the other, uses linguistic and / or non-verbal means. The aim of the research is to single out the qualification features of the concept conflict on the basis of Ukrainian-language, Russian-language and English-language lexicographic discourse. The main qualifying features of the concept conflict on the material of Ukrainian-language lexicographic discourse are: aggravation, clash, complication, contradiction, disagreement, dispute, fight, incompatibility; on the material of Russian-language lexicographic discourse: ambivalence, boarding, clash, collision, complication, confrontation, contradiction, debate, disagreement, discord, dispute, dump, fight, hitch, opposite, quarrel, skirmish, squabble, strife, struggle; on the material of English-language lexicographic discourse: argument, disagreement, fighting. Universal for the three analyzed lexicographic discourses qualification features of the concept conflict are the following: aggravation, ambivalence, argument, boarding, clash, collision, complication, confrontation, contradiction, debate, disagreement, discord, dispute, dump, fight, fighting, hitch, incompatibility, opposite, quarrel, skirmish, squabble, strife, struggle.en_US
dc.identifier.otherУДК 81:159.955
dc.identifier.otherDOI https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2021.20.1.15
dc.identifier.urihttps://r2.donnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/2433
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherУжгород: Закарпатські філологічні студіїen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesЗАГАЛЬНЕ МОВОЗНАВСТВО;Випуск 20. Том 1, с. 83-85
dc.subjectEnglish-languageen_US
dc.subjectqualification features, conflicten_US
dc.subjectconcepten_US
dc.subjectlexicographical discourseen_US
dc.subjectRussian-languageen_US
dc.subjectUkrainian-languageen_US
dc.titleРЕПРЕЗЕНТАЦІЯ КОНЦЕПТУ КОНФЛІКТ У ЛЕКСИКОГРАФІЧНОМУ ДИСКУРСІen_US
dc.title.alternativeREPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN LEXICOGRAPHIC DISCOURSEen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Файли
Контейнер файлів
Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
Гарбера_Стаття_Ужгород_2021.pdf
Розмір:
418.22 KB
Формат:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Опис:
Стаття у збірнику наукових праць Закарпатські філологічні студії. Випуск 20. Том 1 РОЗДІЛ 4 ЗАГАЛЬНЕ МОВОЗНАВСТВО
Ліцензійна угода
Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Вантажиться...
Ескіз
Назва:
license.txt
Розмір:
1.71 KB
Формат:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Опис: